Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV516
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy