Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +299%
3.994 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
10
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy