Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +1384%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
112
128
TMUs
28
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G80
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy