Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +395%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Oland
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy