Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 211.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1046MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +42%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
2.812 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
993 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1046 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.29 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.812 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
117.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
170W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK104
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy