Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 172.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +205%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 33
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 33
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy