Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +1205%
3.994 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK107
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy