Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 4550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 10.48GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +4060%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4550
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
655 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.48GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
80
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV710
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy