Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +11%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy