CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
VS
AMD FirePro W9000
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
+11%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
VS
Radeon Pro W6400
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Board Design
274W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
2
AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
3
AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
4
AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
5
AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
6
AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
8
AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800
9
AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
10
AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy