Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +237%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 640SP
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy