Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +147%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tobago
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy