Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +78%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
36
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy