AMD FirePro W9100 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+275%
19.66 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W9100
3552
Arc A770
+281%
13560
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
275W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-512
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
