Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +39%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2048
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tonga
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy