Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +771%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
2816
Shading Units
192
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
106W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF106
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy