Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

AMD FirePro W9100 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +369%
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
8192
176
TMUs
512
64
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net