Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +450%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy