AMD FireStream 9170 vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+1589%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2023
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
