AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
RV670
-
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
