AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD FirePro S9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
+953%
5.238 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jul 2015
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
