Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +911%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2019
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
320
Shading Units
1408
16
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
125W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy