Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 +553%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
195W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy