Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 +736%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy