Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +91%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy