Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1777MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB +1730%
9.098 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1552 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1777 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
320
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.86 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
142.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.098 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.098 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
142.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
12 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy