Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +2352%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Navi 33
-
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy