Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1052%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy