AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD FirePro RG220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+1150%
1 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
M93
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
