AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+92%
1 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
400
40
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Redwood
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
