Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE

AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250 +4900%
1 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 SE
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
G98S
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy