AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+221%
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630
0.311 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
800
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF108
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
