AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 10 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 10GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 10 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 10 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (420.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
6368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 10 GB
+3513%
36.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2355 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
420.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
800
Shading Units
7168
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
564.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.13 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
36.13 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
564.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD104-275-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
