AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+900%
1 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
800
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GF119
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
