AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA P104 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM P104 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P104 100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
P104 100
+565%
6.655 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2017
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
800
Shading Units
1920
40
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
