AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 600W)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2617MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
23264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
+12500%
126 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2025
FireStream
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
188
800
Shading Units
24064
40
TMUs
752
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
752
-
RT Cores
188
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
502.5 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1968 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
126.0 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
126.0 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.968 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
600W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GB202
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
