AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+22%
1 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2016
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
