AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (107W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+476%
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
107W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
