AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon VII
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon VII 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon VII
+1244%
13.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2019
FireStream
Generation
Vega II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
112.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
420.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.88 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.44 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.360 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
295W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
