Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA T600

AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
T600 +70%
1.709 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
TU117
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy