Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FireStream 9270 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +124%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy