AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
+533%
7.603 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
185W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU106
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
