Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
15584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +6781%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
128
800
Shading Units
16384
40
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy