AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
+3328%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
800
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GT216
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
