Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +733%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
G94B
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy