Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +476%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
800
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
G94B
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy