AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
+52%
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU117
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
