Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 +437%
6.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
800
Shading Units
1920
40
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
TU104
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
TU104-150-KC-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy