Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +2127%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
800
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy