Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +125%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy