AMD FireStream 9350 vs Intel Arc A580
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Arc A580
+509%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
3072
72
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.536 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-512
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
